<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Israfil or Flex Mojos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techper.net/2008/07/15/israfil-or-flex-mojos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techper.net/2008/07/15/israfil-or-flex-mojos/</link>
	<description>About Technology in My Life</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian Gruber</title>
		<link>http://www.techper.net/2008/07/15/israfil-or-flex-mojos/#comment-7780</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Gruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techper.net/2008/07/15/israfil-or-flex-mojos/#comment-7780</guid>
		<description>Confirmation: The community around flex-mojos is more robust.  I haven't worked on much in the way of Flex projects in over a year and a half, so if israfil-mojo works, go for it, but if it doesn't and VELO's flex-mojos works, please use it.  I just haven't had the time to keep up with it.

The only other clarification is that Israfil's mojo is licensed BSD, whereas flex-mojos is licensed with GPLv2.  That shouldn't make a difference, given the use pattern of maven-plugins, but if it does due to internal corporate policy, it's worth noting.

Pros to Marvin and his community for taking flex-mojos as far as it's gotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confirmation: The community around flex-mojos is more robust.  I haven&#8217;t worked on much in the way of Flex projects in over a year and a half, so if israfil-mojo works, go for it, but if it doesn&#8217;t and VELO&#8217;s flex-mojos works, please use it.  I just haven&#8217;t had the time to keep up with it.</p>
<p>The only other clarification is that Israfil&#8217;s mojo is licensed BSD, whereas flex-mojos is licensed with GPLv2.  That shouldn&#8217;t make a difference, given the use pattern of maven-plugins, but if it does due to internal corporate policy, it&#8217;s worth noting.</p>
<p>Pros to Marvin and his community for taking flex-mojos as far as it&#8217;s gotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VELO</title>
		<link>http://www.techper.net/2008/07/15/israfil-or-flex-mojos/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>VELO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techper.net/2008/07/15/israfil-or-flex-mojos/#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Just a small fix.  Flex-mojos doesn't support flex 2.

I was thinking on add flex 2 support.  But I don't find a good reason to do so.

If required, is doable.  But right now, flex-mojos doesn't support flex 2.


VELO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Just a small fix.  Flex-mojos doesn&#8217;t support flex 2.</p>
<p>I was thinking on add flex 2 support.  But I don&#8217;t find a good reason to do so.</p>
<p>If required, is doable.  But right now, flex-mojos doesn&#8217;t support flex 2.</p>
<p>VELO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
